Harden Trade Bad For NBA

The Oklahoma City Thunder’s decision to trade James Harden to the Houston Rockets has left a bad taste in my mouth.

Late last night — during the middle of a tough loss by the Oklahoma Sooners that was distracting most of the state — the Thunder traded Harden, Cole Aldrich, Daequan Cook and Lazar Hayward to Houston in exchange for Kevin Martin, Jeremy Lamb, two first-round picks and a second-round pick that belonged to Charlotte.

One of the draft picks is Toronto’s from the Kyle Lowry deal and the other comes courtesy of the Los Angeles Lakers in the Jordan Hill deal last season.

Some fans will debate whether it was worth it for Harden to fight for the extra $5.5 million he will get from Houston, but I don’t think fans would be willing to leave money on the table when they negotiate their next contract.

On top of that, Oklahoma City was unable to offer Harden the fifth-year that Houston can because of the new collective bargaining agreement. According to that document, teams can only sign one player to a five-year deal, the rest of the roster can only accept a contract for a maximum of four years.

While it may seem blasphemous to say right now, there’s a strong possibility that Martin will provide more reliable outside shooting than Harden provided and that Lamb could develop into a great compliment to Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook and Serge Ibaka. The problem with playing that “what if” game is the fact Harden was already a great compliment to their core group of players and he was their best three-point shooter last season.

Oklahoma City might also win the “lottery” with one of the two draft picks they secured in this trade. If they can get a top-five pick in the draft next June then Sam Presti will once again look like a genius.

So while there is hope for how this deal could play out in the future, what really stings is the fact the Thunder made a business decision instead of a personnel one when they were poised to start a season where they challenged for an NBA Championship.

When Oklahoma City dealt Jeff Green to Boston for Kendrick Perkins a couple seasons back it stunned the fans and the players left on their roster. However, that was clearly a move made to give a young roster more experience and to toughen up their bigs. But trading Harden to Houston? That amounts to the Oklahoma City not having the kind of money needed to pay him $five million over five seasons due to worries about luxury tax payments. That’s a scary message for a small-market team to be sending to its players and fans.

What frustrates fans of the team is that Oklahoma City could have played out this season without any real penalty. Before this trade went down they were almost guaranteed a spot in the Western Conference Finals and many pundits had them playing in the NBA Finals.

Now? They still have a chance, but the odds aren’t nearly as good.

If Oklahoma City rode out this season they could have at least matched any offer that Harden received next summer and then traded him. So, they would have still gotten some pieces back and they would have been able to play out this season competing for an NBA Championship.

Last season the NBA played 66 games so that the league would have a competitive playing field. The idea was that bigger markets like Los Angeles, New York, Boston, Chicago and Miami would no longer be able to dictate where the star players went.

So much for that utopian idea.

Heading into this season, Los Angeles alone is home to Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Chris Paul, Dwight Howard, Steve Nash and Blake Griffen.

Meanwhile, Miami boasts heir own big three and Boston has three future Hall-of-Famers in Rajon Rondo, Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett.

It’s a shame the rich continue to get richer while small-market teams will continue to struggle to compete.

Even worse, it stinks that Oklahoma City cashed in their chips before even giving this season a chance to unfold.

Game 4 Won’t Silence Westbrook’s Critics

As all the cool kids like to say nowadays, haters gonna’ hate.

It seems that during the NBA Finals it became fashionable to pick on Russell Westbrook. Not just for his horrible fashion choices, but because he was shooting more in the NBA Finals that he did during the regular season.

Hopefully Westbrook’s play in Game 4 of the NBA Finals will silence his critics and all the haters.

Westbrook started the game 3-3 from the field and scored six of Oklahoma City’s first 13 points of the game while dishing out an assist. His strong play helped the Thunder roll to a 13-3 lead and forced Miami to call a timeout to stop the bleeding.

Yes, Westbrook got a little shot happy midway through the first quarter, but for the most part he was the player who gave Oklahoma City a chance to secure a much-needed win for Oklahoma City in Game 4 of the NBA Finals.

One of the things that swung this game in favor of Oklahoma City early in the game was Miami’s inability to rotate or switch when a pick was set for Westbrook. Throughout the first quarter Westbrook was able to burst by a stunned Miami defender who had been blindsided by a pick and shoot uncontested 17-footers that easily found the bottom of the net.

Westbrook set up shop at the elbow and made jumper after jumper over the course of the game. Then, when Miami’s defense started to collapse on him, he used his speed to get to the rim for easy buckets.

Miami fought back from some early adversity and rallied from a 17 point deficit in the second quarter. How did OKC stop the rally? Westbrook fed Durant for a bucket and on the next possession he fed Harden for a big three while Dwyane Wade was crumpled on the court.

Westbrook then hit a big jumper near the two minute mark of the second quarter to push OKC’s lead to 45-42. He had 16 points at that points while going an efficient 8-14 from the field.

“Russell (Westbrook) is one of the best point guards in the NBA,” Scott Brooks raved to ABC after the first quarter. “He attacks the basket. He’s a winner. He plays the right way and I’m proud of the way he started this game.”

Just when Miami appeared to be running away with the game in the fourth quarter, Westbrook scored 13 straight points for Oklahoma City and tie the game at 90 with six minutes remaining.

Westbrook played all 12 minutes in the fourth quarter while scoring 17 points. The best part is he went 7-9 from the field during the final quarter.

Throughout the game it seemed as if whenever Oklahoma City was making positive things happen it was Westbrook who had his hand in his teams strong play.

All this to finish with a game-high 43 points.

Sure, there’s a learning curve that Westbrook is currently going through, but he’s one heck of a young point guard who is just learning how to play the position. Fans just need to be patient through the growing pains he is sure to go through at times.

“It’s not deserving at all because without him we wouldn’t be here at this point, and people don’t recognize that,” Durant explained to the media this weekend when he was asked about the criticism being directed at Westbrook. “Everybody thinks he should be a traditional point guard like a Stockton or a Mo Cheeks. There’s a lot of people that cannot be like Russ, either.”

Westbrook’s teammates fully support him so it’s not like he’s going to change the way he plays. Nor should he.

Granted, Westbrook had his share of mental mistakes in Game 4 and he had nearly twice as many field goal attempts as Durant, but the positives far outweighed the negatives.

Hopefully his strong play in Game 4 will force fans to stop drinking the Haterade when it comes to assessing Westbrook and how he plays.

Podcast: Conference Finals Rundown

Mark and McNeill chatted about Boston struggling to close out games against Miami, Chris Bosh’s impact on Miami, the adjustments Scott Brooks made in Game 3, and how the Spurs can regroup.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Here’s the link to download the MP3.